Standardization in nature .

 

Standardization in nature .

in creating the beings, nature has done standardization, 
we see a lot of common features in the basic structure of all living beings, including trees.

with hardware, [visible structure]

and software [invisible inside} which governs its growth, sustenance and procreation

 

--in man , animals, insects, a body and mind,

 in trees a visible trunk, leaves etc and invisible internal system which gives the direction and energy to mobilize its life processes

a reproductive mechanism with organs
limbs to achieve required tasks

senses of perception and action

also,

 in detailing there is standardization like all have two eyes, one mouth , two ears,

but

some flexibility also exists like some insects have 6 feet,

depending on requirements even a deviation like a she dog has 4 pairs of breast to feed 4 at a time

however, newness is not overlooked,

every entity has new form, though features are same

 

--no two men are alike, no two mango trees are alike, no two cows are alike

standardization and variety going hand in hand,

--infinite variety yet features are standard

old and new existing without disharmony

----designs which are ancient are being created afresh with newness,
all nice doings by nature

Evolution beyond darwin

 

Evolution beyond darwin

vanara , hanuman evolved to vanarendra, thru tapasya, and merged in parabrahma

naga , to nagendra, adored nagabhuhsan , and merged

khaga to khagendra

mathsya to mathsendra

vrushabhendra

varaahendra

tulasi to vishnu tulasi

 

Nara is evolving to narendra

devas are evolving to devendras

parvat to parvath raja to parvathendra

sagar to ksheera sagar to amrithsagar

 

Vruksharaja,

nandi, brungi,

simha to narasimha

 

But what it means

all these are different product lines , attaining the iterative perfection , design improvement to the ultimate brhman level

 

We do not evolve nut in to a spanner

spanner evolves to better spanner, adjustable, pipe wrench, different sizes, with different shapes including ring spanner or ratchet spanner ,

but never never in to nut

Nut is not evolved from spanner

its birth is for a specific purpose, context, need, definitely not from spanner

nut becomes better and better as the evolution of design happens like a hex, square nut , thin ,thick different sizes , but nut never replaces a spanner

 

So please note that we need to know the origin of the creation, its original state, how a first impulse takes birth where how when

how it manifests, grows takes shape, what factor, why a variety

and why there is standardization in nature

 

what its trend , what in n time frame , at what rate .

darwin is ok, but can we not think better,

should we stop thinking hanging on this theory, and stop thinking originally with our inner native wisdom

think