explained in words, and which cannot be
understood thru words, since words are
inadequate , cannot help really.
Also the absolute truth can be comprehended truly only by
‘’being’’ that Brahman itself
‘’being’’ that Brahman itself
That being the limitation of words, and that being the
power of Brahman,
power of Brahman,
and every individual entity being only a manifest aspect
of Brahman,
of Brahman,
as a jeeva, with certain unique identity, shape, size, points of view,
capabilities and limitations, whatever, who ever expresses, however accurately
, that expression will be a ‘’partial’’
and ‘’ unique’’ truth with reference to
certain parameters/ assumptions / understandings / experiences / perceptions but
never can be a precise complete full truth
capabilities and limitations, whatever, who ever expresses, however accurately
, that expression will be a ‘’partial’’
and ‘’ unique’’ truth with reference to
certain parameters/ assumptions / understandings / experiences / perceptions but
never can be a precise complete full truth
so it follows that
any two individuals can never truly concur, however much they debate /argue /fight/
assert/ shout/ convince/ explain /exhort,
any two individuals can never truly concur, however much they debate /argue /fight/
assert/ shout/ convince/ explain /exhort,
then is this debate / or any debate just a wasteful exercise??
No, it is an exercise in exploring one’s depths and reach
as much deep as possible to arrive at the absolute truth if at all possible ,
or as nearer as possible
as much deep as possible to arrive at the absolute truth if at all possible ,
or as nearer as possible
A dialog with anyone ‘’outside’’ is a dialog that goes on
‘’within’’ the individual between ‘’the guru and shishya that reside in one’s self’’
‘’within’’ the individual between ‘’the guru and shishya that reside in one’s self’’
Since each individual is a student and a teacher both
simultaneously
simultaneously
This is the most useful outcome of all debates,
irrespective of whose words are acceptable, concurred ,disapproved, disliked ,discarded,
ignored,
irrespective of whose words are acceptable, concurred ,disapproved, disliked ,discarded,
ignored,
So in the discussion we may not reach a valid, mutually
acceptable concurrence of views.
acceptable concurrence of views.
It ends with open ended
And this exploration by the ‘’internal’’ guru and shishya gets
triggered when a person/ words/ phenomenon is encountered, in awe, in wonder ,in fear, in
suspicion, in devotion, in hope, in various mixed feelings , and leads to
discovery of ‘’internal wealth of wisdom’’, bringing out the potential powers/enhancing
one’s all-round abilities including the power of expression , one tends to overflow
in creative expressions , some times poetic/ sometimes musical, sometimes literary
, artistic modes , and all in bliss , ananda
triggered when a person/ words/ phenomenon is encountered, in awe, in wonder ,in fear, in
suspicion, in devotion, in hope, in various mixed feelings , and leads to
discovery of ‘’internal wealth of wisdom’’, bringing out the potential powers/enhancing
one’s all-round abilities including the power of expression , one tends to overflow
in creative expressions , some times poetic/ sometimes musical, sometimes literary
, artistic modes , and all in bliss , ananda
So the outcome mainly is the ananda, nothing less , what
more is required!!
more is required!!
So ‘’the moving finger writes, having writ moves on’ , regardless
of ‘’come what may’’ from the outside receivers
of ‘’come what may’’ from the outside receivers
That is how , the life becomes enriched, fulfilled
No comments:
Post a Comment