the lord, being abve the law of karma, did adopt means fair or foul, end justifying the means
1 to subdue bali, vaman asked a 3 feet land ,using the weakness/virtue, daana , of bali ,occupied the heaven and earth in two steps, impelling bali to offer his head to rest the third step on his head, only to be sent to paathaala
2 to subdue vaali, ram killed him hiding behind a tree, not a way for a kshathriya to fight with an opponent
3 to end bhasmasur, vishnu turned into mohini, overtly covertly deceived him into keeping his hand over his head as a nruthya bhangima
4 to avert the danger of asur sipping the amruth, emerged as result of a combined eff****f sur and asur, in saagar manthan the lord again did deprive them of their share, pouring amruth only to deva[rahukethu escaping]
really inexplicable are the ways of lord!
[prabhu needu mahima theliyaga vashama]
lord, is the purest of the pure, the paramaathma, the self
sword cannot cu_t- i_t
fire cannot burn it
water cannot we_t_ i_t
air cannot dry it
but for mortals the law of karma does prevail
inescapable are the consequences of a karma, what ever may be the end , even unknowingly done
however for a realized individual [shankara]
yadyadkarma karomi thath thath akhilam
shambho thava aaradhanam
so to rise ****ve the law of karma, a mortal has to rise to the level of the lord, to enjoy a similar privilege and freedom–of adopting any means towards a good end
conversely, end does justify the means, in the case of a realized individual only
Tags : god
No comments:
Post a Comment