in the aam aadmi way, aravind kejriwal said ''i do not need security, god is there to take care of me'' this is amid the vip culture of a to z security
i saw a report on tv, that there is a village chenchupalli, varangal ap, in which the houses have no doors, no thefts, even when they go out for days omonths to neibouring villages,
there is nothing we have to get stolen'' they say, and there are no police too
i found another episode in this link on another doorless village
Undiscovered Indian Treasures: Shani Shinganapur: A Lockless village where God is Guardian
Shani Shinganapur: A Lockless village where God is Guardian
quote
''In the modern times where, together with the technology advances,
crimes too become more sophisticated and the concerns for more and more security measures gains priority,
is it possible to imagine a place where people live in harmony in no-door-no-locks-houses ?
It may seem unbelievable but as a matter of fact, true!
There is indeed a tiny hamlet where houses and other buildings like shops have no doors,
and that place is in the country of countless legends and myths – India.
In Shani Shingnapur village, people live in houses with no doors for generations!
Here one can find only curtains (that is also rare) in the place of doors.
The only temporary guard is barriers – that too to keep off stray animals.
Here villagers get to their daily routines without bothering about their house’s security or fear of thieves.
For them, everything is dedicated to the Lord Shani.
The belief is, whoever steals anything from this place will incur the wrath of Shani God and will have to pay for his/her sins very dearly.
When Shani Shingnapur natives go outside their village, they don’t ask their neighbors to keep vigil on their house & belongings.
There is no Police station in this village too. They have no role here! ''
unquote
what a contrast, in the contemporary crime scene
    | |
TAKING NO SECURITY IS A POLITICAL DRAMA...NOTHING ELSE........ GOING BY METRO OR PUBLIC TRANSPORT COUNTS HEAVY ON THE PUBLIC THAN TAKING SECURITY...... ONE SHOULD ACCEPT THE POSITION AND SHOULD ACT ACORDING TO NEED...... | |
  | |
Thanks yes, i feel some fresh thinking, may be a drama too we shall wait for some time to see the truth | |
| |
SIR, ITS NOT NEW...IN THE PAST....TOO MANY CM HAVE TAKEN THESE KIND OF DECISIONS....BUT LATERON THEY PREFERRED TO ACCEPT THE NORMS OF THE SECURITY PERSONNELS.... | |
| |
Recently, ap Governor narasimhan said he likes to go free fearless, without security / convoy, wants to live a commoner life, peddling a bike, and catching a rtc bus may be some rethink happening even vasundhara raje dropped red light | |
| |
SIR, ITS THE DUTY OF THE SECURITY PERSONNEL TO PROVIDE SECURITY TO PM/CM/LG OR ANY OTHER DIGNITIES.....INDIAN TRANSPORTATION AND SYSTEM IS NOT FOOLPROOF....THE NEW IDEAS WORKS ONLY WHEN YOU HAVE THE INFRA IN YOUR SYSTEM.....ALL THESE DECISIONS COSTS TO PUBLIC HIGHER THAN TAKING SECURITY....ITS Y OPENION.....LET US WAIT AND SEE>>>>>> | |
| |
Agreed sir, as long it is based on requirement, it is ok and it is desirable too, but within reasonable limits, but definitely not for show off the status, and distancing from people who gave them that position there is no justification for vvip augsta helicopters with crores spent, while woman , who needs some care is left to her fate, | |
| |
VERY TRUE SIR, THE LAW OF NECESSACITY AND LUXURY APPLIES TO THIS ALSO....... | |
| |
Finally it is one's own purity that protects , not the arranged security with the best of weapons | |
No comments:
Post a Comment