Evolution beyond darwin

vanara , hanuman evolved to vanarendra, thru tapasya, and merged in parabrahma

naga , to nagendra, adored nagabhuhsan , and merged

khaga to khagendra

mathsya to mathsendra

vrushabhendra

varaahendra

tulasi to vishnu tulasi

   

 

Nara is evolving to narendra

devas are evolving to devendras

parvat to parvath raja to parvathendra

sagar to ksheera sagar to amrithsagar

go to gomatha

and i will add more but

   

 

Vruksharaja,

nandi, brungi,

simha to narasimha

   

 

But what it means

all these are different product lines , attaining the iterative perfection , design improvement to the ultimate brhman level

   

 

We do not evolve nut in to a spanner

spanner evolves to better spanner, adjustable, pipe wrench, different sizes, with different shapes including ring spanner or ratchet spanner ,

but never never in to nut

   

 

Nut is not evolved from spanner

its birth is for a specific purpose, context, need, definitely not from spanner

nut becomes better and better as the evolution of design happens like a hex, square nut , thin ,thick different sizes , but nut never replaces a spanner

   

 

So please note that we need to know the origin of the creation, its original state, how a first impulse takes birth where how when

how it manifests, grows takes shape, what factor, why a variety

and why there is standardization in nature

what its trend , what in n time frame , at what rate .

darwin is ok, but can we not think better,

should we stop thinking hanging on this theory, and stop thinking originally with our inner native wisdom

think