My
spiritual task is to reform myself unmindful of environ,
to
allow myself grow as ''keechad se kamal.
i
shall not wait for perfection to dawn from outside
i
reach that ideal thru diving deep within myself ,
I
Do what's right being true to myself
My
spiritual task is to reform myself unmindful of environ,
to
allow myself grow as ''keechad se kamal.
i
shall not wait for perfection to dawn from outside
i
reach that ideal thru diving deep within myself ,
I
Do what's right being true to myself
it is only after cognition that one can appreciate the
aesthetics’’
……..1..Since Brahman is ‘sathyam shivam sundaram’. The one
who cognizes this , accesses truth
[sathyam], and which will have great value [shivam, goodness,], and which will
be beautiful [ sundaram, aesthetic]
He also has the automatic ability to express the cognitions
with spontaneity/originality
These cognitions form the basic ingredients.
1.1 He can deliver them in ‘’as cognized shape’’, these are
the different vedic expressions, with their own ‘’unmodified pristine purity’’
1.2 he can also deliver them as ‘’creations/art’’ with
imagery / icons .[devi devathas] having some relevant characteristics .
and this creation happen as a process of
‘’anando brahma’’ creativity in the state of bliss
1.3 also he can choose to deliver these with enhanced
communication, with another ingredient om, / shadaj, forming sangeeth , with 7
swaras, 3 sapthaks, raga, thaala, and, bhava [poetry added] , thru human voice
or thru contrivances like veena, mrudang , ghungru
1.4 also he has a choice of delivering it in sculpture
form, human form , with ingredients of cognized mudras, and gracious movements,
nruthyam,
1.5 he has a choice of adding a theme/an episode/and make
it into a drama
1.6 he can choose to add a bit of tinge of
localization/time frame, and deliver as a folklore
That is how the cognitive abilities also lead to infinite
freedom to express the basic universal ingredients cognized …basically it is
the joy of the one to create and create in variety beauty and …and a joy to see
the masterpieces created as a mother loves the offspring to grow and flourish ,
basically it is a lone journey in search of better and more effective ways to communicate to the manifest world
But it is added joy if these products are seen by a few
others , deriving and sharing joy similarly
That is how the connoisseur comes into the picture
But not all have ability to receive what is delivered by
the creator. If connoisseur has a similarly the ability to cognize, then he
will see the beauty of expression, how the simple universal truths which ..he also knows..have taken such wonderful
creations , and his appreciation will be
naturally automatic , and he may in turn tempted to clap or to give a standing
ovation, or even gets triggered to move his limbs in synchrony and he may even
dance in ecstasy. And this may inspire the creator to venture a little more
All these are great possibilities with the single ability
ie ‘’to cognize’’
Blessed are the creator and connoisseurs they inherit the
heaven
. ‘’And
it is only after cognition that one can appreciate the aesthetics’’
I see it …as a emphatic true assertion…with vedic
implications ..this gives a great clue for connoisseurs to enjoy every detail
with relish , since they become better rasagnas, ….not only that…this clue is
for the artists as well to create masterly output, since they have fathomed
great depths.
Further, the artist will grow in the ability
experiences come and go. Cognition/knowledge remains’’
...........so it delineates what is valuable and what is
not, and takes one out from illusions of spiritual attainments based on ‘’experiences’’,
like unusual visions apparitions /images/noises/messages/coincidences, and
resultant mixed feelings/emotions leading them to relate with bhakthi/ista devatha etc , missing the ‘’Cognition/knowledge’’ they might have/
have not stumbled up on , hence, resultant
glorification of mysticism.
‘’That is what I have been telling all along - 'anubhava'
is not a 'pramana', it is subjective, differs from person to person, and cannot
be passed on.
……..…yes, perfectly reasonable, most important to distinguish
what to really learn from the great souls, separating the biography[ it may
have due place as an inspiration], and person-specific ‘’miracles’’ and only getting
at the insights they have gained and expressed, which only can enrich the
wisdom .
‘’Knowledge is obtained through Pramana - 'Valid means of knowledge'’’
prior to learning acting, if the actor first attains the
state of ''yogastha'', then his life becomes untouched, and his playing the
character in a drama also becomes untouched, he may be in tears rolling, but
deep in the core he might be experiencing ''no grief '', and hence could convey
the bhava
the ability to experience and /express /convey the bhava as
real as possible , ie nearest to life, indicates the depth of the artist, /
sincerity/ devotion to the art,
and so i come to a valid conclusion that ..the artist first
much reach his depths , thru intense sadhana and get at the cognition of
brahman, which is the source of all arts, kalanidhi, and all aesthetics,
saundarya, and truth/ authenticity
with this initial preparation the first quarter of the
life, he turns out to be a great success in every undertaking, like that of
singing/ acting.
if we see a not so good performance, the reason is that
essential tapasya , is lacking, so the
resultant mediocrity. and cannot move the audience greatly